x
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
70877882b0
commit
ce2f4cf0c8
93 files changed
+4200
-67
No files matched your search
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
|
||||
# Handoff Report — Milestone 2 Forensic Integrity Verification Audit
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Observation
|
||||
* **Database Schema (`apps/backend/prisma/schema.prisma`)**:
|
||||
* Line 642: `rootImage String?` under `model Menu`
|
||||
* Line 656: `columnImage String?` under `model MenuItem`
|
||||
* Line 657: `hoverImage String?` under `model MenuItem`
|
||||
* **TypeScript Types (`packages/types/index.ts`)**:
|
||||
* Lines 200-201: `columnImage?: string | null` and `hoverImage?: string | null` under `export interface MenuItem`
|
||||
* Line 210: `rootImage?: string | null` under `export interface Menu`
|
||||
* **Elysia Router (`apps/backend/src/routes/menus.ts`)**:
|
||||
* Lines 42-50: mapping `rootImage` to menu create data, and mapping `columnImage` and `hoverImage` to list of items.
|
||||
* Lines 121-122 & 141-142: mapping `columnImage` and `hoverImage` to `tx.menuItem.update` and `tx.menuItem.create` inside the database transaction block.
|
||||
* Lines 64, 69-70 & 168, 174-175: validation definitions (`rootImage: t.Optional(t.Nullable(t.String()))`, etc.) in the Elysia body validation objects.
|
||||
* **MCP Helper Tools (`apps/mcp-server/menu-tools.ts`)**:
|
||||
* Lines 185-191: validation schemas checking for `columnImage` and `hoverImage` being string or null when defined.
|
||||
* **MCP Toolkit Handler (`apps/mcp-server/menu-toolkit.ts`)**:
|
||||
* Lines 46, 57, 58: inputs schemas defining `rootImage`, `columnImage`, and `hoverImage` on the `upsert_menu` tool.
|
||||
* Lines 236-240: mapping `rootImage` parameter to the API request body.
|
||||
* **Behavioral Verification Output (`test_menu_api_challenger.ts` execution)**:
|
||||
* Excerpt from run:
|
||||
```
|
||||
=== STEP 3: Perform correct Menu creation & retrieval ===
|
||||
Creation status: 200
|
||||
Created menu: {
|
||||
"id": 15,
|
||||
"name": "challenger-test-1782768911150",
|
||||
"payload": null,
|
||||
"rootImage": "https://example.com/challenger-root.png",
|
||||
...
|
||||
Verification Results:
|
||||
- rootImage correct: true (Expected: https://example.com/challenger-root.png, Got: https://example.com/challenger-root.png)
|
||||
- columnImage correct: true (Expected: https://example.com/challenger-column.png, Got: https://example.com/challenger-column.png)
|
||||
- hoverImage correct: true (Expected: https://example.com/challenger-hover.png, Got: https://example.com/challenger-hover.png)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Logic Chain
|
||||
1. By examining the database schema (`schema.prisma`), we observed that the three fields `rootImage`, `columnImage`, and `hoverImage` have been correctly declared as optional strings.
|
||||
2. By reviewing the router file (`routes/menus.ts`), we observed that all routes (`POST` and `PUT`) map the new fields properly during creation, update, and deletion within Prisma transactions. No static mapping or bypass logic is present.
|
||||
3. By reviewing the MCP server implementation (`menu-tools.ts` and `menu-toolkit.ts`), we verified that the tools expose these fields in the input schemas and validate their types correctly before invoking the backend API.
|
||||
4. By running the test suite (`test_menu_api_challenger.ts`), we verified at runtime that values are correctly saved, retrieved, updated, and validated under local PostgreSQL and Bun environment.
|
||||
5. Therefore, the implementation contains zero signs of integrity violations or bypasses.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Caveats
|
||||
* TypeScript checking for `apps/backend` outputs a large number of errors related to relative file extensions (e.g. `TS2835`) and implicit any bindings (e.g. `TS7006`) due to strict `nodenext` module settings. This is a pre-existing project-wide configuration mismatch rather than a regression of this feature, as it does not prevent Bun from executing the backend cleanly at runtime.
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Conclusion
|
||||
The database and backend updates for the Premium Mega Menu (3-image layout) are authentic, complete, and properly integrated without any integrity violations. The verdict is **CLEAN**.
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Verification Method
|
||||
* To independently run behavioral verification:
|
||||
1. Ensure the PostgreSQL container/service is running.
|
||||
2. Start the backend: `cd apps/backend && bun run start`
|
||||
3. Execute the challenger test suite: `bun apps/backend/test_menu_api_challenger.ts`
|
||||
4. Inspect the printout results to verify they output `Verification Results: ... correct: true`.
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user