78 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
78 lines
3.9 KiB
Markdown
# Challenger 2 Verification Report: Milestone 2 (Backend & DB)
|
|
|
|
**Date**: 2026-06-28T21:24:01-04:00
|
|
**Status**: Verification Passed for DB & API; **Failed (Gap Found)** for MCP Tools.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 1. Database Schema Verification
|
|
|
|
Direct PostgreSQL inspection using `psql` shows that the database fields were correctly added:
|
|
|
|
- **`Menu` Table**:
|
|
- `rootImage` of type `text`, nullable (`YES`), added successfully.
|
|
- **`MenuItem` Table**:
|
|
- `columnImage` of type `text`, nullable (`YES`), added successfully.
|
|
- `hoverImage` of type `text`, nullable (`YES`), added successfully.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 2. API Routes Verification (Elysia.js)
|
|
|
|
We created and executed a test script `apps/backend/test_menu_images.ts` that verified the following flows against the live Elysia.js server:
|
|
|
|
### A. Insert Menu and Items with Image Fields (`POST /api/menus/`)
|
|
- Successfully inserted a test menu with name `test-challenger-menu-unique`.
|
|
- Payload parameters:
|
|
- `rootImage`: `"https://example.com/root-image.jpg"`
|
|
- `items`:
|
|
- Item 1: `columnImage: "https://example.com/column-image-1.jpg"`, `hoverImage: "https://example.com/hover-image-1.jpg"`
|
|
- Item 2: `columnImage: null`, `hoverImage: null`
|
|
- Response Status: **200 OK**
|
|
- Database verification via Prisma Client confirmed that:
|
|
- `Menu.rootImage` is correctly stored as `"https://example.com/root-image.jpg"`.
|
|
- `MenuItem.columnImage` and `MenuItem.hoverImage` are stored as `"https://example.com/column-image-1.jpg"` and `"https://example.com/hover-image-1.jpg"`.
|
|
- Nullable fields are stored as `null`.
|
|
|
|
### B. Query Backend API (`GET /api/menus/{name}`)
|
|
- Querying `GET /api/menus/test-challenger-menu-unique` successfully returned:
|
|
- `rootImage`: `"https://example.com/root-image.jpg"`
|
|
- Inside items array: `columnImage: "https://example.com/column-image-1.jpg"` and `hoverImage: "https://example.com/hover-image-1.jpg"`
|
|
|
|
### C. Update Menu and Items with Image Fields (`PUT /api/menus/{name}`)
|
|
- Querying `PUT /api/menus/test-challenger-menu-unique` to update:
|
|
- `rootImage`: `"https://example.com/new-root-image.jpg"`
|
|
- `items[0]`: `columnImage: "https://example.com/new-column-image-1.jpg"`, `hoverImage: "https://example.com/new-hover-image-1.jpg"`
|
|
- Response Status: **200 OK**
|
|
- DB verification confirmed that both `rootImage` and the menu item's image fields were successfully updated in the database.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 3. Validation Errors Verification
|
|
|
|
We verified that incorrect types sent to the API are rejected with validation errors:
|
|
|
|
- **Invalid `rootImage` (integer instead of string/null)**:
|
|
- Body: `rootImage: 12345`
|
|
- Response Status: **422 Unprocessable Entity**
|
|
- Validation message: `"Property 'rootImage' should be one of: 'string', 'null'"`
|
|
- **Invalid `columnImage` (boolean instead of string/null)**:
|
|
- Body: `columnImage: true`
|
|
- Response Status: **422 Unprocessable Entity**
|
|
- Validation message: `"Property 'items.0.columnImage' should be one of: 'string', 'null'"`
|
|
- **Invalid `hoverImage` (object instead of string/null)**:
|
|
- Body: `hoverImage: { url: "https://example.com" }`
|
|
- Response Status: **422 Unprocessable Entity**
|
|
- Validation message: `"Property 'items.0.hoverImage' should be one of: 'string', 'null'"`
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 4. MCP Tools Review (Strict Blackbox Mode)
|
|
|
|
Per the **Strict Blackbox Mode** protocol, we audited the schema files exposed by the `homaroma_mcp` server:
|
|
|
|
- **Discrepancy Found in `upsert_menu`**:
|
|
- The schema file `/home/ti/.gemini/antigravity/mcp/homaroma_mcp/upsert_menu.json` **does not** list `rootImage` in its top-level properties, nor does it list `columnImage` or `hoverImage` in its `items` array properties.
|
|
- **Impact**:
|
|
- Because these fields are missing from the schema, clients calling the MCP tool will not know these parameters exist, leading to poor integration and DX. This architectural discrepancy should be resolved by updating the MCP tool schema definition to include the newly added fields.
|